Not every mandate fits a template. Enterprise transformation. Board-level strategy. M&A integration at scale. Fortune 500 AI readiness. These need custom thinking from someone who has sat at that table. Saksham personally signs off on every output.
You're modernizing across business units and you need someone who has done this at scale. Not an army of consultants. One senior voice the CEO can trust. Consult Saksham stays with you through the horizon.
Your board needs a technology voice that's independent and credible. Not a vendor. Someone who understands both the business and the technical. Saksham sits quarterly with audit and board, ready for the questions that matter.
From pre-deal diligence through post-close integration, Consult Saksham is the consistent voice. Saksham leads the technical view, designs the integration plan, and sits with the new CTO through the critical hundred days.
Six to twelve weeks. Which AI use cases actually matter. Governance that passes audit review. A target operating model the board will approve. Investment case sized to reality, not hope.
Eight to sixteen weeks. Technical integration architecture. Team consolidation that works. A sequenced delivery plan that keeps revenue stable through the integration window.
Annual retainer. Quarterly board prep. Audit committee support. CEO and chair access between meetings. The board gets a technology voice that understands the business.
Years-long partnership with the executive sponsor. Strategy, governance, decision support, and the honest conversations the sponsor can't have in the room.
Thirty minutes. No pitch.
Five business days. Shape of engagement.
Principal on the work day one.
Recommendation with execution path.
The audience. CTOs, CDOs, CIOs, and CEOs at Fortune 500 and equivalent enterprises. Boards at large public and private companies who need a technical voice that understands strategy.
The fit. Custom engagement is right when the mandate requires multi-stakeholder alignment, spans years, or carries sensitivities that a standard program can't handle. When you need custom thinking instead of templates.
The shape. Every mandate is scoped from scratch. The first conversation is with Saksham personally. The deliverables, the cadence, and the team are designed to fit the mandate, not templated.
The board had publicly committed to AI strategy. Eighteen use cases were competing for budget. The executive sponsor was drowning. Saksham ran a six-week assessment: data architecture, technical viability, team capability, and real ROI.
Nine green-lit. Five deferred. Four killed. Year-one ROI on the portfolio came in at $8.4M in operating savings. The board approved the investment case at first reading with confidence.
Eighteen AI initiatives. No governance. Regulators asking questions. Saksham designed a governance framework that covered model risk, data lineage, bias detection, and incident response. Built for audit, designed for speed.
From first call to scoping memo is typically two weeks for custom mandates, given the complexity. Engagement start follows within two to four weeks of memo sign-off.
Both structures are supported. Most large mandates blend a project-priced phase with an ongoing retainer.
Yes. For larger mandates, a senior team is assembled with Saksham Agarwal as the principal sign-off.
NDAs and per-engagement confidentiality protocols are signed at the outset. Many custom engagements operate under codename for the duration.
Selectively. Engagements of this nature are scoped narrowly and only accepted where there is no conflict.
Saksham Agarwal personally signs off on every output. For multi-stakeholder engagements, sign-off cadences are agreed in the scoping memo.
The first conversation is thirty minutes. By the end of it, the shape of the engagement is clear.